The Ataturk Interview: Armenian Tall Tales or an Inconvenient Truth?

The Ataturk Interview: Armenian Tall Tales or an Inconvenient Truth?

Philip M.Pedley

Philip M. Pedley
Gomidas Institute, 2018,
80 pages, photos

ISBN 978-1-909382-43-5, pb.,
Price: UK£12.00 / US$18.00
To order please contact books@gomidas.org



This work examines the provenance of an interview conducted with Turkish President Mustafa Kemal Atatürk by Karl Emil Hildebrand, published in the US in 1926.  The interview’s significance is twofold.  Firstly, Mustafa Kemal’s acknowledgement of Turkish culpability in Armenian massacres and secondly his assertion that a last-minute confession by a prominent female conspirator thwarted the 1926 Izmir assassination attempt on his life.  Leading Turkish scholar, Professor Turkkaya Ataöv, asserts that the interview is an Armenian fabrication made in support of false claims of genocide.
  New evidence, revealed here, establishes the provenance of the interview.  Mustafa Kemal’s acknowledgement of Ottoman guilt is confirmed.  It is also contended that the Izmir plot conspirator who alerted Mustafa Kemal was Turkey’s leading feminist and PRP member, Halide Edib.  This revelation challenges the prevailing narrative that Mustafa Kemal exploited the attempted assassination to silence innocent PRP members who had no knowledge of the plot.

ATATURK INTERVIEW

KEMAL PROMISES MORE HANGINGS OF POLITICAL ANTAGONISTS IN TURKEY

President Says He Will Forgive Woman, Once His Friend, Who Joined Conspirators
By Mustapha Kemal Pasha

(The Dictator of Turkey, in an interview with Emile Hildebrand, a Swiss artist and journalist, on June 22)

I shall not stop until every guilty person, no matter how high his rank, has been hung from the gallows as a grim warning to all incipient plotters against the security of the Turkish Republic. Since the very hour of its reincarnation in the rejuvenated body of the Republic, our nation has endured travails no other nation has ever experienced.
  When we were fighting external enemies, or enemies whom we were certain were sympathetic with foreign intriguers, nearly all of the rank and file of our population were enthusiastically, even fanatically, united to deliver the nation from the multiple foreign yokes. But no sooner had the nation proved its worth to its foreign detractors than certain elements, bred in the old school of political intrigue, began to show their claws. We were face to face with a menace to the life of the republic from two elements.
  One was the group who combined religious fanaticism and ignorance with political imbecility and who, in the past, under different Sultans had come to believe that the state was an organism to be exploited through debauchery, corruption and brazen bribery for personal ends. I put the ax in the dual root of this sinister and reprehensible theory of government by destroying the Khalif and the Sultan. I sent into exile the persons in whom this theory was personified. Large numbers, adherents of this school of politics, attempted to interpret any act as atheistic, and, under the aegis of religion, began to intrigue against the life of the republic.

SIXTY LEADERS HANG AT DAWN
In several instances in the past when, in Kurdistan and other interior regions of Anatolia, they showed a disposition to challenge the will of the republic, I crushed them with an iron hand, and, for example, had over sixty of their leaders hanged at dawn.
That element had its lesson and will not again attempt to measure swords with me.
  The second element, I am now about to deal with ruthlessly, is the group of men who in the pre-republic days were known in the world as the Committee of the Union of the Young Turks. The ranks of this element were recruited from a questionable assortment of political adventurers, half-educated progressives and men of dissolute habits. In the days when we were battling against foes from within and without, this element joined us and fought in our ranks. Yet from the early days I had misgivings as to their motives. But I wished, hoped and then prayed that once our country was redeemed from the foreign yoke, this element would mend its methods and become infused with the zeal of patriotism. I soon began to realise that my hopes were doomed to be disillusioned and my prayers were to be unanswered. I patiently waited, keeping a sharp eye on their movements.

SEDITIOUS MOVEMENTS CLOAKED
They formed themselves into a political opposition. I do not pretend to be a dictator, bent to suppress sincere and honest political opposition, because a republic is a misnomer when it ceases to brook criticism. But when a group of dissolute, corrupt and unscrupulous political adventurers begin to organise seditious movements under the cloak of political opposition, it becomes the sacred duty of those who are in charge of the machinery of the government to suppress it and suppress it with an exemplary ruthlessness that will prevent the eventual shedding of rivers of blood.
  I am about to show these plotters that the Republic of Turkey cannot be overthrown by murderers or through their murderous designs.…
  These left-overs from the former Young Turk Party, who should have been made to account for the lives of millions of our Christian subjects who were ruthlessly driven en masse, from their homes and massacred, have been restive under the Republican rule. They have hitherto lived on plunder, robbery and bribery and become inimical to any idea or suggestion to enlist in useful labor and earn their living by the honest sweat of their brow.
Under the cloak of the opposition party, this element, who forced our country into the Great War against the will of the people, who caused the shedding of rivers of blood of the Turkish youth to satisfy the criminal ambition of Enver Pasha, has, in a cowardly fashion, intrigued against my life, as well as the lives of the members of my cabinet. I would have more respect for them had they planned an armed revolution, taking the field in a manly fashion, to overthrow my government. But being conscious of the fact that they could not muster out even one regiment to give battle to the zealous adherents to, an [sic] upholders of, the glorious republic, they have resorted to bestial methods of assassination. They have hired murderers and even debauched women to commit their murderous acts.
  In the middle of June last I had planned to make a tour of the country. My itinerary was published. A group of these assassins, placed on the route of procession, were to "rain” hand grenades at the automobiles which were to carry me and my staff.

WOMAN AS BOMBER
They went even further and seduced a woman who had been for years identified with my cause and who had been my loyal political friend and on occasions an adviser. They induced this woman to accept the reprehensible assignment to present me with a bouquet which concealed a bomb that would, on my receiving it, explode and obliterate everyone in sight. This ill-advised woman deserves pity, for she was made to believe that she would thus sacrifice her own life for the good of the fatherland. I was the enemy of the nation. She will be forgiven for her part in the plot, for she conscience-stricken, confessed to the proper authorities in time for me to cancel my intended tour.

Los Angeles Examiner
, Sunday, August 1, 1926 (Sunday Edition, Section VI)

The Ataturk Interview : Armenian Tall Tales or an Inconvenient Truth?
Introduction
The Background
The Interview & the Nercessian Covering Note
The Worldwide News Service: Armenian Fabrication or Fact?
A Minor Newspaper in a Far Corner of the World?
The Style of the Interview
Karl Emile Hildebrand: "Did Anyone By That Name Ever Live?”
Karl Emil Hildebrand and Travels to the Orient
Karl Emil Hildebrand’s Background
An Opportunity to Meet Hildebrand
The Style and Wording in the Hildebrand Interview – "Totally Alien Rhetoric” or Plausible?
Enver Paşa: Utmost Respect or a "Fool-Sycophant”?
The Izmir Conspiracy
Conclusion
Bibliography
About the Author
« Back to books listing